Setting up an R&D centre in Türkiye, conditions and process
Minimum headcount for R&D and design centre status, the assessment criteria, the application process and the discipline needed to keep the status.
Read the articleA grant application in Türkiye is not a form to fill in, it's an answer to a call document. The process starts with reading the call closely, continues through building the budget and work plan, and ends with signing the contract. Most points are lost by answering a different question than the one the call actually asked.
By
Devana Team
Short answer
A grant application in Türkiye is not a form to fill in, it's an answer to a call document. The process starts with reading the call closely, continues through building the budget and work plan, and ends with signing the contract. Most points are lost by answering a different question than the one the call actually asked.
A grant application is not a form filling exercise. An institution publishes a call document, that document states what it funds and whom it excludes, and you describe your project in the language of that document. Most points are lost not because projects are weak but because the answer addresses a question the call did not ask.
| Step | Work | Typical duration |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Eligibility screen | Establishing which programmes you can enter | 1 week |
| 2. Reading the call | Eligible applicants, eligible costs, scoring criteria | 2 to 3 days |
| 3. Project design | Objective, activity plan, output indicators | 1 to 2 weeks |
| 4. Budget | Line by line costs, quotes, co financing plan | 1 week |
| 5. Documents | Chamber records, financial statements, permits | 1 to 2 weeks |
| 6. Filing | Upload to the institution's system, electronic signature | 1 to 2 days |
| 7. Evaluation | Formal check, technical review, site visit if required | Varies by institution |
| 8. Contract | Support decision, guarantee, signature | 2 to 4 weeks |
These are averages. The binding calendar is always the one in the call document.
Three questions come before anything else:
A "no" on any of the three means there is no point preparing a file. This is why the screen is the single biggest time saver in the process.
The call document is the contract. Look for:
The scoring table usually sits as an annex at the end and is the most skipped section. It is also the section that tells you how to write the project.
A good project narrative follows one order: what the problem is today, what the solution is, which activities deliver it, and how the result will be measured.
The problem statement has to be concrete. "We want to increase our competitiveness" earns nothing. "Cycle time on the existing line is 42 seconds per part, which cannot meet the delivery times the target market expects" earns something.
Indicators have to be countable. Employment, capacity, export value, scrap rate. Each one carries a baseline and a target.
Sustainability carries separate points in most calls. It explains how the investment stands on its own once the project ends.
The budget attracts more questions than any other section. Three rules help:
The core list is similar across programmes:
Document collection almost always takes longer than planned. Tax and social security clearance letters have short validity periods, so leave those to the end.
Each institution takes applications through its own system. Ministry of Trade support schemes run through the Support Management System (DYS); KOSGEB applications run through its own panel. Every system requires an authorised user definition and an electronic signature, and those definitions can take days, so they must be ready before the filing date.
Systems get congested at the closing hour. Uploads left to the final day cost a few projects every cycle.
Evaluation usually has three stages: formal pre check, technical review and, where needed, a site visit. More files are eliminated at the formal check for missing documents than at technical review. Form matters as much as content.
Institutions may request further information during evaluation. Those requests carry short deadlines, and missing one can close the file.
When the support decision is issued, a contract is signed and a guarantee provided where required. In most programmes the signature date also starts the eligible expenditure period, so invoices dated earlier fall outside.
What follows is a separate discipline: procurement, interim reports, expenditure documents and closure. That stage is covered under project management.
If you have an investment plan, run the eligibility screen first. It fits on a page and shows which programme offers the better return for your case. At Devana that first assessment is free.
Minimum headcount for R&D and design centre status, the assessment criteria, the application process and the discipline needed to keep the status.
Read the articleWhat an OIZ location is worth on tax, fees and incentives, how the 2024 change to free land allocation works, and the claims that are out of date.
Read the articleGetting the reasons in writing, appeal routes, deciding between an objection and a fresh application, and handling incentive certificate cancellations in Türkiye.
Read the articleThe article covers the general framework. We can look at which clauses actually apply to your file.